embromation
Active Member
 Offline
Posts: 135
Thank You
-Given: 50
-Receive: 478
|
 |
« on: October 25, 2007, 09:16:23 21:16 » |
|
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: November 25, 2008, 05:28:15 17:28 by SONSiVRi »
|
Logged
|
Share your knowledge!
|
|
|
andrea11
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 15
Thank You
-Given: 34
-Receive: 10
|
|
« Reply #1 on: October 26, 2007, 12:32:51 12:32 » |
|
 hi embromation, like crack mikrobasic v6.0.0.0 with the mikrobasic v6.0.0.0 crack.rar? it seems not to work, it says that it does not find the file or I do not have the authorization!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
janbobis
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 10
Thank You
-Given: 2
-Receive: 5
|
|
« Reply #2 on: October 26, 2007, 12:38:39 12:38 » |
|
All links are working but the contents are not the actual cracked software...
Your zipped files are only 14KB each.. Did you check that?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
//-----------------------------------------//
//-----------------------------------------//
//- It's hard to bring good men down -//
//-----------------------------------------//
//-----------------------------------------//
|
|
|
andrea11
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 15
Thank You
-Given: 34
-Receive: 10
|
|
« Reply #3 on: October 26, 2007, 08:34:41 20:34 » |
|
i have tested and works correctly YES!
try uninstall and install the software and aply this crack...
sorry not works!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Kabron
Active Member
Offline
Posts: 198
Thank You
-Given: 64
-Receive: 144
|
|
« Reply #4 on: October 29, 2007, 02:29:45 14:29 » |
|
Basic do not work.
Here's the test code.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
LuoPan19770708
Junior Member
Offline
Posts: 86
Thank You
-Given: 22
-Receive: 11
|
|
« Reply #5 on: October 30, 2007, 01:18:10 01:18 » |
|
I have tested, all of the cracks are OK!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
rod27cn
Junior Member
 Warned
Offline
Posts: 51
Thank You
-Given: 43
-Receive: 36
|
|
« Reply #6 on: October 30, 2007, 01:26:45 01:26 » |
|
I am using the same cracks, i dowloaded from other source all works fine for me.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Stefkeb
Junior Member
Offline
Posts: 92
Thank You
-Given: 139
-Receive: 85
|
|
« Reply #7 on: November 10, 2007, 08:46:54 08:46 » |
|
Hi,
I'm just wondering why you put so many "Delay_ms(1)" in ? Delay_ms(150) or so will do the same.
Does this has a special reason or is it a mistake ?
With best regards,
Stef.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
captcurzk
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 23
Thank You
-Given: 1
-Receive: 2
|
|
« Reply #8 on: November 13, 2007, 06:17:30 18:17 » |
|
New crack to microbasic v6.0 not work as it shoud! Any Idea?? This combination works perfectly here. Btw, what do you mean with "not work as it should" ?
I mean if I build large routine I got error messages (demo-limit)!! Waiting for new working keygen! |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: November 16, 2007, 12:07:38 12:07 by captcurzk »
|
Logged
|
I'm old man but still alive as well
|
|
|
|
|
verde321
Junior Member
Offline
Posts: 93
Thank You
-Given: 79
-Receive: 40
|
|
« Reply #10 on: November 16, 2007, 03:05:42 03:05 » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Kabron
Active Member
Offline
Posts: 198
Thank You
-Given: 64
-Receive: 144
|
|
« Reply #11 on: November 18, 2007, 07:29:36 19:29 » |
|
Listen, Men!
How many times to say: the guys from RL-Team.Net just like a Kooperfild. It's a bad work. Test a code I'd uploaded before. 26% of uC ROM compiled . It's OK?
Forget about RL-Team cracks. It's a fiction!
Actually the only working cracks from this team: PIC uPascal 7, AVR uPascal 4.02 and AVR uBasic 4.02. And even in this i'm not shure 100%.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: November 18, 2007, 07:35:36 19:35 by Kabron »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
F873
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 9
Thank You
-Given: 15
-Receive: 9
|
|
« Reply #12 on: November 28, 2007, 06:42:15 06:42 » |
|
not works
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
captcurzk
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 23
Thank You
-Given: 1
-Receive: 2
|
|
« Reply #13 on: December 28, 2007, 04:13:38 04:13 » |
|
File not found anymore it's deleted from RS! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I'm old man but still alive as well
|
|
|
leemarrow
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 32
Thank You
-Given: 328
-Receive: 52
|
|
« Reply #14 on: December 29, 2007, 03:12:45 15:12 » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Stefkeb
Junior Member
Offline
Posts: 92
Thank You
-Given: 139
-Receive: 85
|
|
« Reply #15 on: December 30, 2007, 12:35:15 12:35 » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Faros
Senior Member
Offline
Posts: 254
Thank You
-Given: 141
-Receive: 178
|
|
« Reply #16 on: January 05, 2008, 02:53:01 02:53 » |
|
PIC microcontroller has a page segmented memory, what mikroElektronika has done in their compiler software is , they have allowed demo users to use their compilers within one page segment (2k approximately) while the linker will report a “demo limit” massage when linking a larger code.
If you are using 16F628x for example (demo or full version) will give the same result.
If you are using a chip with a flash memory larger than 2K (example 16F877 or similar), your code will be working if it is less than 2k unless you have the full version.
A good crack should not only disable the “Demo limit” massage but also it should allocate the linker to link codes over the 2k limit.
The crack supplied in this page only disable the “Demo limit” massage however it doesn’t correctly permit the linker to link the full code; so the linker report another linker error “procedure too long” when the code is over one page i.e. larger than 2K.
So this crack is not working… I hope I was clear enough.
Regards;
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Stefkeb
Junior Member
Offline
Posts: 92
Thank You
-Given: 139
-Receive: 85
|
|
« Reply #17 on: January 05, 2008, 12:37:08 12:37 » |
|
Hello Faros, Can you supply an example that fails to compile ? Please check: http://www.mikroe.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=12984&highlight=procedure+long It seems this is more a problem of the compiler itself than a bad crack. The program comes with some examples, see what happens if you compile a big program with the demo version and what happens after you apply the crack. Rgds, Stefkb |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Faros
Senior Member
Offline
Posts: 254
Thank You
-Given: 141
-Receive: 178
|
|
« Reply #18 on: January 05, 2008, 02:15:51 14:15 » |
|
Dear Stefkeb Why should I provide a new code example? Kabron has done this in this page ( http://www.sonsivri.com/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=5933.0;attach=595) In this example the linker will break at almost 26% of the PIC flash code size (page barrier) and will report linker error.(try a real test yourself) Mikrobasic has some bugs; whenever there is a new version released; it comes with new bug list; but linker limit errors are known to be a cracking error. It has started in their early version 2 and up till now. Last known working crack was done by “Fallout “ as a Keygen for version 4.x. some said it worked also for version 5.x. Regards; |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Stefkeb
Junior Member
Offline
Posts: 92
Thank You
-Given: 139
-Receive: 85
|
|
« Reply #19 on: January 06, 2008, 12:47:30 12:47 » |
|
Hello Faros,
Mikrobasic has it's bugs, I completely agree. The error generated when compiling Kabron's code however is a shortcoming of the compiler, not the crack, please check the link in my previous post to Mikroe's forum where this 2K boundary problem for PIC16 devices is discussed.
The reason I ask for more examples is that I think it is not correct that if a single piece of code fails to compile simply a crack/compiler is believed to be bad.
If we would test all software around like this nothing would make it to market !
Some more testing with reproduceable examples would be fair I believe.
With best regards,
StefkeB.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Faros
Senior Member
Offline
Posts: 254
Thank You
-Given: 141
-Receive: 178
|
|
« Reply #20 on: January 07, 2008, 11:51:11 11:51 » |
|
Dear Stefkeb
I believe I have rushed into that conclusion. I admit I made a mistake.
I always test whatever posted (code/circuit) before making my judgment. Those how made this effort (compilers or crackers) deserve at least more time to judge their attempt.
I just found I lot of code in your link page that I couldn’t test before posting my last reply nevertheless I have tested some examples as you kindly advised and found to be working (especially for 18F series) where memory paging has different management technique.
I had read the complete manual of Mikrobasic version 2.xx (more than 2 years ago) and they have stated that 2k sized procedures are not allowed. That point was dropped because I have never used Mikrobasic since.
I like Mikro-electronica; both the products and the developers, and I see some hidden benefit of using their compilers, If you utilize one efficiently, you are maneuvering them all. I will do some home work regarding this subject and will get back to you.
Thank you for your patience.
Faros
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
zara
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 12
Thank You
-Given: 44
-Receive: 23
|
|
« Reply #22 on: February 03, 2008, 09:10:06 21:10 » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RoninMBV
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 22
Thank You
-Given: 2
-Receive: 6
|
|
« Reply #23 on: February 04, 2008, 01:51:55 13:51 » |
|
The new compilers are about to come out ......www.mikroe.com has already posted mikroC ver. 8.....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
service
Junior Member
Offline
Posts: 45
Thank You
-Given: 32
-Receive: 34
|
|
« Reply #24 on: February 05, 2008, 02:27:54 02:27 » |
|
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: September 08, 2008, 01:52:47 01:52 by service »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
