You want to put a glass touchscreen on a phone...sorry...you want to shut it off...sorry. If you invest millions of $$$ innovating, why should some Korean or Chinese company get your investment for free? It may seem stupid, but then why do you want to use it if it is?
In Apple's case they didn't innovate or invent said system, they stole it like everyone else except that they fooled the patent office into giving them exclusive rights... There is a big difference here, from something they actually invented... The iPhone was FAR from the first touchscreen phone and it was NOT the first slide to unlock screen phone either, so to suggest they deserve compensation for theft as the thief themselves is a little far fetched...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tj-KS2kfIr0 Advance to the 4 minute mark for the down and dirty...
That exact Windows CE phone has proven to be a failure to Apple's claims is multiple courts already... That phone was actually in production (2004-5) and on the market well before Apple even filed to own the slide to unlock feature that they stole, but that isn't stopping Apple from continuing to lay claim to the idea and attempting to profit from it as well a using it to stop competitors products from coming to market, because they exploited the patent system for their personal gain...
So I asked you why should Apple be allowed to not only use it for free but profit from something they stole from someone else, not an idea they invented or innovated? Is this what patents are for in your option, to lay claim to stolen ideas and profit from them?