REQ: CCS-C PCWH 4.056 update

[godblessu]

Please put 4.049 on Rapidshare network

http://rapidshare.com/files/49965500/image_files.rar

Password: www.sonsivri.com

[ducky2002]

Thanks....seems to be the real 4.049...no virus detected.

Good job.

[cyber_drifter]

Think I'll wait till version 100.001 comes out and all the bugs are fixed lol

[cerebronico]

I can't keep this pace, current release as of today is 4.052!

I can't imagine what is going in CCS's people's minds, they fix some bugs and create new ones??

really this is a crap compiler

 

[GreenGiant]

People ALWAYS request the newest version as it comes out.

Go check http://www.ccsinfo.com/devices.php?page=versioninfo
See if you REALLY need the update.

All the updates have been bug fixes, not new features, so most likely you DONT need the update unless it affects something your using already and see a problem with.

IE. the .51 just posted, has an ADC bug. So now will you be demanding that someone post .52 ?

[mayli]

Now the most update version is 5.2.

Can anyone upload the update to here?

The Update can soft AD convert module bugs

[softjad]

It is always difficult to find the most recent versions...

[ahmadexp]

note : CCS449 is only PCWH and not PCWHD , is't mean that your complier is not ready for dsPIC or PIC24
also i think this version is not realy 4.049 and is 4.038 thatwas edited with resource tunner 0.95
take care

[mayli]

The most update version is 4.053. Can anybody provide download link?

 
Thank you

[venda]

thanks

[tavioman]

Hey, PUMA why don't you use HiTech C?
It's a much better compiler.
Recently I have made a really big project with CCS and I was really dissapointed. Many many bugs in CCS.
Even for some simple stuff. Myself I will switch to hitech or IAR. It does not matter if they are expensive anyway. You don't pay nothing for them as log as sonsivri will exist.
So, do something smart and start using HiTech. It's a better choice.

[softjad]

the better choice... or not...

[godblessu]

I tried to use CCS and really has many BUGS. I think MIKROC or HITECH is better.

[softjad]

I prefer CCS... for me it is better, but each one chooses what wants to use. I never had problems with this.

 

[ysy]

ccs is a buggy software, its lib source code isnot open. iar hitech, even mcc18 are better than ccs.
 its extensive C keywords confuses me, code isn‘t portable.

[tavioman]

@PUMA
I never work with Mplab.
I'm using Visual Studio as an editor. It's much more easy.
VS2005 it's a very powerful editor.
I'm using VS2005 for CCS and for HiTech.
I don't like MPLAB.

[Robi]

Hey, PUMA why don't you use HiTech C?
It's a much better compiler.
Recently I have made a really big project with CCS and I was really dissapointed. Many many bugs in CCS.
Even for some simple stuff. Myself I will switch to hitech or IAR. It does not matter if they are expensive anyway. You don't pay nothing for them as log as sonsivri will exist.
So, do something smart and start using HiTech. It's a better choice.

OK tavioman, we have understood that HiTech C is your preferred compiler and I cannot blame you for this as its really a better product compared to CCS. HOWEVER, are you aware that latest HT_PICC960_Crack won't work with latest PICC demo 9.60 ??
The latest picc (demo) version is here for others to use (or crack it hopefully).
http://rapidshare.com/files/52656220/picc-demo_960.zip.html

[iso]

one more advantage of ccs picc is  abilty of produce coff file. this case you can simulate your project with proteus isis. you also can do this with hi-tech but cant with micro c.am i true?

[tavioman]

@ROBI
Why do you need the latest version?
We should make a new section(s) here for each PIC compiler.
We could colaborate and make functions(or macros) for HiTech that look's just like CCS ones.
eg: spi_write, spi_read, eeprom_write, etc...
It's not that hard. If you look at the MPLAB C18 files you will see functions for this things that are 100% ANSI. HiTech it's also 100% ANSI.
If people have trobles with the different data types they could use something like this:
#ifdef CCS_COMPILER

Code:

#ifdef CCS_COMPILER
	typedef int8			UNSIGNED8
	typedef signed int8		SIGNED8
	typedef int16			UNSIGNED16
	typedef signed int16	SIGNED16
#elif defined HI_TECH_COMPILER
	typedef unsigned char	UNSIGNED8
	typedef signed char		SIGNED8
.
.
.
#elif defined MPLAB_C18_COMPILER
.
.
.
#endif

And simply define the compiler at the beggining of the code.
After that use the new typedefs:
UNSIGNED8 foo = 234;

[GreenGiant]

While we veering oftopic, id be willing to help out with that noted by tavioman.

[Robi]

Why do you need the latest version?

Which latest version ? CCS ? I don't want latest CCS. Just asked if someone has a new crack for Hitech picc 9.60 because old one does not work anymore. I knew that C18 and Hitech are both full ANSII. I did not ask that.

[etm503]

@PUMA
I never work with Mplab.
I'm using Visual Studio as an editor. It's much more easy.
VS2005 it's a very powerful editor.
I'm using VS2005 for CCS and for HiTech.
I don't like MPLAB.

Hie,
Is it possible to do any simulation with VS2005 like Mplab does? Like proteus integration as a simulation tool?

[tavioman]

It's not possible to do this direct but you could make a command line for launching either Proteus or MPLAB and simply hit debug button on VS.
But I never do this. I simply load the hex or cof file into Proteus.

[xzb]

who have CCS-C PCWH 4.053 ?

[cyber_drifter]

Is it version 4.053 already? I just updated to 4.049. I can't keep up with all the updates