mayler
Junior Member
 Offline
Posts: 68
Thank You
-Given: 14
-Receive: 13
Roger that!
|
 |
« Reply #50 on: January 08, 2008, 02:59:14 14:59 » |
|
I am using CCS actually, because i think the implementation of internal functions of PIC are more natural than Hi-Tech... Maybe i will try again Hi-Tech someday  . My only concern about CCS is some bugs that the compiler still have ( 1 for that i used had a wrong asm implementation ). |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Computer Engineer.
Digital IC Designer - Cadence certified.
|
|
|
Futterama
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 12
Thank You
-Given: 0
-Receive: 2
|
|
« Reply #51 on: January 08, 2008, 03:17:33 15:17 » |
|
I'm using CCS PICC. Actually I don't like the built-in functions, I'd rather read the PIC datasheet. The wizard is great, a good starting point so you get get some simple code running in no time. The old IDE in version 3 was nice. The one in version 4 can be confusing - I had trouble with adding files to my projects until I discovered that including the file in the source code and then compiling it, would automatically include the file in the project window. But hey, I can just read the manual - but sometimes I'm like "Read the manual when everything else fails" ;-)
The CCS user forum is great, I you post all relevant information about your problem. I only use that forum for posting problems and I always write my solution when I find it - so others can benefit from it.
And last, the CCS compiler is often provided in this forum for free. I don't have the money to buy it yet :-(
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Halex
Guest
|
|
« Reply #52 on: January 08, 2008, 05:13:29 17:13 » |
|
I am using mikroC, mikroElektronika C compiler. Its very useful compiler for beginer C programer.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
neteagle
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 8
Thank You
-Given: 1
-Receive: 0
|
|
« Reply #53 on: January 08, 2008, 06:52:28 18:52 » |
|
I use CCS for more than 3 years now. Very efficient compiler, but with some minor bugs (I2C function). Some bugs with PIC12F integrated oscillators too.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
spkt
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 9
Thank You
-Given: 4
-Receive: 1
|
|
« Reply #54 on: January 09, 2008, 07:25:08 07:25 » |
|
I think that CCS is very easy for beginner, because I don't need to watch carefully PIC datasheet
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ugur
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 12
Thank You
-Given: 0
-Receive: 0
|
|
« Reply #55 on: January 09, 2008, 08:59:23 08:59 » |
|
Hi all. Im use PICC compiler.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phu_thanh
Guest
|
|
« Reply #56 on: January 09, 2008, 10:16:03 10:16 » |
|
Hi
I like Microchip C compiler since it is a full-featured ANSI compliant C compiler.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
lionking
Guest
|
|
« Reply #57 on: January 09, 2008, 08:45:14 20:45 » |
|
hi
i use CCS C as a beginner but i am not sure about profesional process is CCS C enough for all ?
thanks..
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
leandrohuff
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 7
Thank You
-Given: 0
-Receive: 0
|
|
« Reply #58 on: January 10, 2008, 04:14:24 16:14 » |
|
Hi all, I like to use CC5X by B Knudsen Data on http://www.bknd.com, very easy to intergrate into MPLAB, nice compiler to use with free editors. Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
shibuv
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 30
Thank You
-Given: 0
-Receive: 7
|
|
« Reply #59 on: January 14, 2008, 09:30:12 09:30 » |
|
I am using Microelektronica C , it is very good
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
omni
Active Member
Offline
Posts: 139
Thank You
-Given: 169
-Receive: 176
|
|
« Reply #60 on: January 15, 2008, 03:35:22 03:35 » |
|
It seems everyone has their own preference.  I have been using CCS C for awhile now and the compiler seems to have some deficiencies but otherwise it is fairly decent. I did read that some people have found problems with CCS and that CCS in general breaks two and fixes one thing with each new release. Perhaps a fully ANSI C compiler like Hi-Tech PIC C might be better in general but I'm yet to give it a real try. I looked at MikroC as well, and seeing its C code it appears to be something between HT-PIC C and CCS C. I wonder about the SDCC being a free multi-platform compiler and how it measures up to the rest... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
valefrancy
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 7
Thank You
-Given: 1
-Receive: 2
|
|
« Reply #61 on: January 15, 2008, 08:49:49 08:49 » |
|
I started with PICC but after trying MIKROC was much more easy to write a program has many features that really is crive alone
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ulderico
Junior Member
Offline
Posts: 72
Thank You
-Given: 154
-Receive: 819
|
|
« Reply #62 on: January 15, 2008, 06:08:51 18:08 » |
|
Microchip C18 has everything you need for Pic18.
Bye!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
human_controller
Guest
|
|
« Reply #63 on: January 17, 2008, 01:57:58 01:57 » |
|
I am using PIC C
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
engvidal
Inactive
Offline
Posts: 4
Thank You
-Given: 1
-Receive: 0
|
 |
« Reply #64 on: January 20, 2008, 01:26:18 13:26 » |
|
Ther is no easier than CCS.
Look for Brazilian books
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
wnmaximino
Active Member
Offline
Posts: 151
Thank You
-Given: 47
-Receive: 202
Homer
|
|
« Reply #65 on: January 20, 2008, 02:40:38 14:40 » |
|
I prefer MkroC, it´s very good compiler for PIC.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
lutfuakcil
Inactive
Offline
Posts: 5
Thank You
-Given: 5
-Receive: 1
|
|
« Reply #66 on: January 22, 2008, 08:05:33 20:05 » |
|
CCS is very succesfull for code portation one to another PIC , but if you know assembly, you should choose hi-tech or C18
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
YSK
Guest
|
|
« Reply #67 on: January 22, 2008, 09:27:33 21:27 » |
|
Hi!
I like to use "hi-tech picc". Because its ANSI support.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
saint
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 23
Thank You
-Given: 21
-Receive: 69
!! SAINTRULEZ !!
|
|
« Reply #68 on: January 22, 2008, 09:45:59 21:45 » |
|
Hi, I'm using CCS compiler...Main reason is, you write the code in "C"  (just kidding...) I'm also using the U40 programmer (ICSP) with CCS...Both of them supports almost all PIC series and programmer is really fast...CCS has really nice algorithm while converting the "C" code to the macros and than asm instructions...Therefore, your code does NOT consumes large space in PIC... saint... |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 22, 2008, 10:05:37 22:05 by saint »
|
Logged
|
System Design Engineer...
!! You DON'T DIE if you "Thank" someone !!
Visit TURKEY on your next vacation...
|
|
|
|
yangzy
Guest
|
|
« Reply #69 on: January 23, 2008, 12:32:44 00:32 » |
|
I have been using CCS C for 5 years.
I like it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
shobits1
Junior Member
Offline
Posts: 40
Thank You
-Given: 15
-Receive: 10
|
|
« Reply #70 on: January 24, 2008, 06:51:24 18:51 » |
|
hi I think PICC Compiler is the most powerfull, in other hand CCS C compiler is easy
but i like PICC
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
actionstk
Guest
|
|
« Reply #71 on: January 26, 2008, 05:25:43 17:25 » |
|
I'm use CCS C Compiler. This is best choice for me.
Posted on: January 26, 2008, 06:21:31 18:21 - Automerged
MikroC for me, pretty easy to use yehhh
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
vsmGuy
Junior Member
Offline
Posts: 35
Thank You
-Given: 11
-Receive: 7
|
|
« Reply #72 on: January 27, 2008, 10:39:26 10:39 » |
|
CCS !
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
camel_acml
Guest
|
|
« Reply #73 on: January 27, 2008, 01:41:40 13:41 » |
|
I finally can gather info frm u all |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Orcino Borges
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 23
Thank You
-Given: 13
-Receive: 18
|
|
« Reply #74 on: January 28, 2008, 05:34:54 17:34 » |
|
CCS is very easy, but have more bugs. I use mickroc.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
