The Godfather talking
You can run, but you can't hide.
Sonsivri
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 22, 2024, 07:41:39 19:41


Login with username, password and session length


Pages: [1]
Print
Author Topic: CCS C and Mikro C ?????  (Read 4484 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
monthon
Guest
« on: January 08, 2008, 06:15:40 06:15 »

Hi.... Grin

I want to learn pic programming.  Is it programming pic in c. i should use CCS C OR MikroC or any other u suggest me.


Thanks,
monthon
Logged
EDSONCT
Junior Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 36

Thank You
-Given: 72
-Receive: 5


WWW
« Reply #1 on: January 08, 2008, 08:56:38 08:56 »

Both is good, but i prefer mikroC.

Edson
Logged
omidsht
Active Member
***
 Muted
Offline Offline

Posts: 192

Thank You
-Given: 60
-Receive: 16



« Reply #2 on: January 08, 2008, 03:07:13 15:07 »

yes , mikroc is very powerfull and easy to use , i use mikroc for dspic and i am satisfied with it .


omid
Logged
Futterama
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 12

Thank You
-Given: 0
-Receive: 2


« Reply #3 on: January 08, 2008, 03:21:48 15:21 »

I started with PICbasic and it was really easy to get going.

Later when I learned C (using MPLAB and HiTech C), I changed to CCS PICC and I always use this one for new projects.

When I use other peoples projects, I can switch between CCS PICC, HiTech C, Microchip C18 and so on because the C-syntax is always the same. Eg. when using Microchips Ethernet driver, I use C18 and MPLAB because the code is made for that.
Logged
mayler
Junior Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 68

Thank You
-Given: 14
-Receive: 13


Roger that!


WWW
« Reply #4 on: January 08, 2008, 04:18:52 16:18 »

For whose that have knowledge in C, CCS is a good choice ( at least for me, I program in assembly / C / C++ in PC ), with a lot of examples and drivers ready. But I think that for midrange it's good to learn first the assembly for pics because it's easy and it's good to have an experience with a low level language, principally when you need to make an optimized routine.
Logged

Computer Engineer.
Digital IC Designer - Cadence certified.
setoy
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 20

Thank You
-Given: 10
-Receive: 11


« Reply #5 on: January 09, 2008, 10:08:44 10:08 »

microC create 20%-30% more code than CCS, haven't full  pre-proccessor support, about any optimizations is just senseless to talking and is not easer to learn/use than CCS:) . I think, it is not good choice.
Logged
phu_thanh
Guest
« Reply #6 on: January 09, 2008, 10:28:53 10:28 »

Hi!
For me I prefer to use Microchip C compiler. It is  a full-featured ANSI compliant C compiler and it does come with Peripheral library for quick coding. For 16 bits MCU , it generates as much as 30% less code than other 16-bit MCU compilers.
Logged
xane
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 9

Thank You
-Given: 6
-Receive: 2


« Reply #7 on: January 10, 2008, 09:17:12 09:17 »

Hi,
I have used Microchip C Compiler as well, but I found CCS compiler much easier to learn and work with.
Additional stuff with Ver 4 and ICDU-40 make debugging simpler

CCS works better and eats less recourses on my system.

Logged
zaliko
Guest
« Reply #8 on: January 12, 2008, 02:37:37 14:37 »

Hi,
I use mikroC for Microchip PIC MCU. It is very easy to use.
Logged
spkt
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 9

Thank You
-Given: 4
-Receive: 1


« Reply #9 on: January 13, 2008, 03:47:03 03:47 »

Hi,
How about MikroPascal?
Logged
takapy
Guest
« Reply #10 on: January 13, 2008, 04:21:16 04:21 »

I have preference for CCS, for me, it's best.
Logged
leandrohuff
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7

Thank You
-Given: 0
-Receive: 0


« Reply #11 on: January 16, 2008, 06:04:50 18:04 »

MikroC is powerfull for beginners, but there other compilers for professionals and advanced programmers. I like to use compiler that easy integrate inside of MPLAB and I use MPLAB to edit and debug my programs.
Logged
planet69
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 26

Thank You
-Given: 5
-Receive: 8


« Reply #12 on: January 17, 2008, 03:26:02 03:26 »

for beginners, i strongly suggest that you choose a compiler that has an established support program like a user forum
CCS has one.  Wink
Logged
breakenter
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 11

Thank You
-Given: 3
-Receive: 0


« Reply #13 on: January 21, 2008, 08:02:54 08:02 »

MIKRO C and product of Mikroe is unserviceable.. to much bugs.
This product is for application type "blik led" but no for profesional work.
Logged
Pages: [1]
Print
Jump to:  


DISCLAIMER
WE DONT HOST ANY ILLEGAL FILES ON THE SERVER
USE CONTACT US TO REPORT ILLEGAL FILES
ADMINISTRATORS CANNOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR USERS POSTS AND LINKS

... Copyright © 2003-2999 Sonsivri.to ...
Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC | HarzeM Dilber MC