cjack
Junior Member
Offline
Posts: 76
Thank You
-Given: 100
-Receive: 1524
|
|
« on: January 04, 2010, 05:13:31 17:13 » |
|
Hi all! finally it's here: CCS PCWHD 4.104 CCS provides a complete, integrated tool suite for developing and debugging embedded applications running on Microchip PIC®MCUs and dsPIC® DSCs. This suite includes an IDE for project management, a context sensitive C aware editor, build tools and real time debugger...helping developers create, analyze, debug and document project code. The PCWHD compiler supports the Microchip PIC® PIC10, PIC12, PIC16, PIC18, PIC24 MCU families and dsPIC® DSCs. PCWHD Compiler includes: Standard C pre-processors, operators and statements, interrupt handlers, discrete I/O, multiple compilation units, constants in ROM, float, ICSP and in-circuit debugging capabilities. FULL VERSION download here: http://www.fileden.com/files/2010/1/4/2713447/C4104.rarpassword: charon Someone can host the file in a better place?? Greetz to all
|
|
« Last Edit: January 13, 2010, 04:45:03 16:45 by cjack »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
MGLSOFT
Junior Member
Offline
Posts: 69
Thank You
-Given: 32
-Receive: 73
|
|
« Reply #1 on: January 04, 2010, 06:28:21 18:28 » |
|
We could upload it on Megaupload ... Thanks!!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
koky
Active Member
Offline
Posts: 181
Thank You
-Given: 155
-Receive: 157
|
|
« Reply #2 on: January 04, 2010, 06:47:52 18:47 » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
cjack
Junior Member
Offline
Posts: 76
Thank You
-Given: 100
-Receive: 1524
|
|
« Reply #3 on: January 04, 2010, 11:12:22 23:12 » |
|
Well done koky
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
chyelim
Junior Member
Offline
Posts: 81
Thank You
-Given: 747
-Receive: 134
|
|
« Reply #4 on: January 07, 2010, 04:47:43 16:47 » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
mikepic
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 23
Thank You
-Given: 18
-Receive: 8
|
|
« Reply #5 on: January 12, 2010, 03:06:07 15:06 » |
|
It is a demo version?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
oldvan
Senior Member
Offline
Posts: 372
Thank You
-Given: 154
-Receive: 107
If the van is a Rockin'...
|
|
« Reply #6 on: January 12, 2010, 03:15:07 15:15 » |
|
Not to be a total prick or anything, but shouldn't rule 19 apply here? 19-Information is important, so always add it to your post (short explanation, screenshots if available). Only posting links wont help to others.It grows tedious having to Google to try to figure out what someone is sharing, I'd imagine that is the reason for #19 in the rule book. EDIT in response to yahoo: If somebody doesn't know what is PCWHD and what means 4.104 for sure it is not for him What of those unfortunate HiTech addicts? Should we not try to lure them over to the dark side?
|
|
« Last Edit: January 14, 2010, 04:13:48 04:13 by oldvan »
|
Logged
|
Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and he will sit around in a boat drinking beer all day.
|
|
|
yahoo
Active Member
Offline
Posts: 163
Thank You
-Given: 56
-Receive: 111
|
|
« Reply #7 on: January 13, 2010, 03:41:39 03:41 » |
|
If somebody doesn't know what is PCWHD and what means 4.104 for sure it is not for him
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
cjack
Junior Member
Offline
Posts: 76
Thank You
-Given: 100
-Receive: 1524
|
|
« Reply #8 on: January 13, 2010, 04:44:00 16:44 » |
|
Right OldVan, rules are rules, description added. Greetings and enjoy FULL version of PCWHD
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
yahoo
Active Member
Offline
Posts: 163
Thank You
-Given: 56
-Receive: 111
|
|
« Reply #9 on: January 14, 2010, 02:12:06 14:12 » |
|
It looks the latest versions are stable enough and even with less bugs compared to the most stable 3.249 that many people still use. I found so many bugs in 3.249 that I cannot use it anymore. They are all fixed in the latest versions, support for the latest micros and the most important is reducing the code size. One big my project with 20k+ lines of code produce 76% ROM use for 18F8722 with bugs. The same code compiled with 4.104 is error free and it is only 66%, I saved over 13% from the flash for future improvement. So it is time to switch to the latest versions and to forget about "the most stable" 3.249
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
FriskyFerret
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 560
Thank You
-Given: 513
-Receive: 360
Put it in, take it out.
|
|
« Reply #10 on: January 14, 2010, 03:05:56 15:05 » |
|
On September 9, 2009 you wrote:Me too. I did professionally many many projects and products using v3.249 - it is stable and reliable version. The only disadvantage I have so far is that there is no support for the newest micros and only in this case I use the latest version. Today you wrote:I found so many bugs in 3.249 that I cannot use it anymore...So it is time to switch to the latest versions and to forget about "the most stable" 3.249 So, which is it?
|
|
« Last Edit: January 14, 2010, 03:09:12 15:09 by FriskyFerret »
|
Logged
|
Dancing pants and leotards, that's what I'm talkin' about!
|
|
|
yahoo
Active Member
Offline
Posts: 163
Thank You
-Given: 56
-Receive: 111
|
|
« Reply #11 on: January 14, 2010, 05:59:07 17:59 » |
|
My case is different. I test everything for my evaluation but when I have to make business I buy what I need. So I had to wait more than a hundred versions after version 4.0 to have a stable product which I plan to buy. And now it looks they are close to a good product. I knew most of the bugs in 3.249, I avoid them and it works. But when the program become bigger enough (in the last case 20k lines of code) I started to see some unpredictable returned values from functions and it is very hard to support a product when every new compilation may affect a code which was working before.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
metal
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2420
Thank You
-Given: 862
-Receive: 678
Top Topic Starter
|
|
« Reply #12 on: February 03, 2010, 12:35:05 12:35 » |
|
man... this compiler is for hobbyists, not used for businesses. Use Hi-Tech for your business.. Posted on: February 03, 2010, 01:34:20 13:34 - Automerged
You can recognize this is a full version when you see it contains sources of libs
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
picfan
Junior Member
Offline
Posts: 61
Thank You
-Given: 714
-Receive: 313
|
|
« Reply #13 on: February 08, 2010, 01:47:25 13:47 » |
|
Hello!
Yesterday I tested 4.104 with 2 of my application:
1 - 16f877, lcd, rs232: 4.104 gain some rom & ram to 3.249
2 - 18f4550, Glcd, usb (use math.h): 4.104 go out of ROM, 3.249 compile using 95% ROM.
Had anyone compared 3.249 to 4.104 using math.h ?
Picfan
|
|
« Last Edit: February 09, 2010, 09:11:04 09:11 by picfan »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ismail505
Junior Member
Offline
Posts: 44
Thank You
-Given: 1
-Receive: 64
|
|
« Reply #14 on: February 09, 2010, 06:20:31 06:20 » |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: March 11, 2010, 08:01:24 20:01 by ismail505 »
|
Logged
|
A man is like a fraction whose numerator is what he is and whose denominator is what he thinks of himself...
|
|
|
robban
Senior Member
Offline
Posts: 265
Thank You
-Given: 34
-Receive: 38
Warrior
|
|
« Reply #15 on: March 08, 2010, 09:25:39 21:25 » |
|
man... this compiler is for hobbyists, not used for businesses. Use Hi-Tech for your business..
Well, we have a true pro here obviously...
|
|
|
Logged
|
Code Warrior
|
|
|
|